Breaking

Friday, April 26, 2019

Classification Of Industry

Classification Of Industry

Vous tes libre de copier, distribuer et\/ou modifier les documents de ce site, la seule condition de citer la source. GNU Free Documentation License. By Bernard Guibert, Jean Laganier and Michel Volle - . There can be no economic analysis without classification. Only the classification can give a precise meaning enough to the terms often appear in the economic reports textile industry, "furniture", the steel industry and the rest. Classifications play an absolutely crucial role, but they have a tendency to be dismissed as tedious. They consist of strenuous lists with only the occasional intriguing curiosity to break the boredom. 

The taxonomist is seen as a real technology obsession, and it must be exactly the answer to questions that seem to divide hair every day: the manufacture of plastic shoes come under shoes manufacture or under manufacture of plastic products? what's the distinction between shipbuilding and the building of pleasure boats? Should joinery be categorised as manufacture of wood and wood products or as building construction? The authors of this article, who used industrial labels regularly on either the INSEE or the French Ministry of Industrial and Scientific Development, are trying to explain and after that to overcome this prejudice. 

Their presentation, which aims to define the principles on which the current and past classifications are based, intentionally or otherwise, is unlikely to be accepted by other specialists without modification. By qualifying as realistic certain depictions of reality, society is merely confirming its own tautological certainty that an image of reality which agrees with its representation of objectivity is really objective. This explains why the problems inherent in classifications appear superfluous, dull and pointless. An economist if we might use this image isn't intrigued in the glasses through which he sees the economics, he is, however, greatly intrigued in what he sees. 

Similarly, discussions of claSimilarly, class discussions lead us to look at those fragile, questionable and ultimately questionable groups.ssifications lead us to view as fragile, malleable and eventually questionable those aggregates whose robustness we used to take for granted. The sharp lines that were sharp became uncomfortably vague. Well, for once we're asking the reader to examine those glasses carefully. What do the classifications look like? How are they constructed? Which ones were utilized in the past, and what's happening today? 1 - what's a classification? It isn't a question of linking implications, but to compare and isolating, of analysing, of matching and pick the concrete contents, nothing is more tentative, nothing more empirical than The process of creating an order of things, nothing requires a clearer look or a clearer language and better expression, nothing requires more insistence that the person allows himself be carried along by the proliferation of qualities and forms.
industry" classification of industry" naics code" naics" sic code" naics code lookup" naics codes 2016" naic" naics code search" gics" sic code list" standard industrial classification" naics code list" north american industry classification system" naics lookup" gics sectors" naics search" industry code" naics code lookup 2016" naic number" global industry classification standard" sic number" naics code list 2016" sic code 2016" business classification list"

Classification Of Industry